Non­fic­tion

Psy­cho­analy­sis and Wis­dom: Encoun­ter­ing Ethics of the Fathers’

  • Review
By – July 30, 2024

In this book, Paul Mar­cus of the Nation­al Psy­cho­log­i­cal Asso­ci­a­tion of Psy­cho­analy­sis explores forty-three of the approx­i­mate­ly 128 mish­nay­ot (para­graphs) of Pirkei Avot through the lens of psy­cho­analy­sis. Each one is giv­en an Eng­lish sub­ject head­ing — e.g., Com­pas­sion,” Sub­mis­sive­ness,” and The Good Life.” He then pro­vides an Eng­lish trans­la­tion of that par­tic­u­lar mish­nah, fol­lowed by well-known com­men­ta­tors’ elu­ci­da­tion. Mar­cus also reflects on the sig­nif­i­cance of each mish­nah by draw­ing on psy­cho­an­a­lysts like Sig­mund Freud, Melanie Klein, H. Kohut, D. W. Win­ni­cott, and Adam Phillips. Mar­cus also cites rel­e­vant pas­sages from twen­ti­eth-cen­tu­ry exis­ten­tial philoso­phers such as Emmanuel Lev­inas, Mar­tin Buber, and Gabriel Mar­cel. He lets the texts encounter each oth­er rather than offer­ing his own pre­scrip­tive readings.

For exam­ple, under the head­ing Mak­ing One­self Avail­able,” Mar­cus delves into mish­nah 20 of chap­ter 4: Rab­bi Mat­tithyah ben Heresh said: Be the first to extend greet­ings to every man; and choose to be a tail to lions rather than a head to fox­es.” Mar­cus explains that enact­ing what the mish­nah calls for can require work on the self through a psy­cho­an­a­lyt­ic process. He also under­scores how dif­fi­cult it is to tru­ly open one­self up to the oth­er, to break through the rigid­i­ty of the ego. Here, he ref­er­ences Mar­tin Buber’s con­cept of I‑Thou, which describes the need to acknowl­edge the other.

Mar­cus also points out that at times, a mish­nah and psy­cho­an­a­lyt­ic thought can be some­what in con­flict. Mish­nah 5 of chap­ter 3 warns against stay­ing up all night. Mar­cus, how­ev­er, argues that being in the dark can be a psy­cho­log­i­cal achieve­ment — can be a time of cre­ativ­i­ty and open­ness to being alone with oneself.

At first, read­ers may see the book as being orga­nized loose­ly. The top­ics dis­cussed are dis­crete, so one can choose which head­ings are most inter­est­ing to them rather than going through them chrono­log­i­cal­ly. In his con­clu­sion, how­ev­er, Mar­cus does argue that the book is built on five cen­tral claims: that psy­cho­analy­sis can offer under­ly­ing insights into what peo­ple con­scious­ly believe are ratio­nal and rea­son­able beliefs; that con­scious and uncon­scious emo­tions affect belief struc­tures not con­cep­tu­al­ized by the rab­bis of Pirkei Avot; that psy­cho­analy­sis can offer a more in-depth and nuanced under­stand­ing” of the con­cepts he believes under­lie the mish­nay­ot; that psy­cho­analy­sis empha­sizes how destruc­tive humans are, which chal­lenges the opti­mism of the rab­bis; and that Pirkei Avot con­tains too much super­ego moral­i­ty,” or too much empha­sis on what human beings should not do.

While these con­clu­sions may of course be sub­ject to coun­ter­claims, Marcus’s book makes an argu­ment for the endur­ing val­ue of both psy­cho­analy­sis and Pirkei Avot.

Josh Han­ft holds Advanced Degrees in Eng­lish and Com­par­a­tive Lit­er­a­ture from Colum­bia Uni­ver­si­ty and curat­ed the renowned read­ing series, Scrib­blers on the Roof, for over twen­ty years.

Discussion Questions