Non­fic­tion

Wal­ter Ben­jamin: The Pearl Diver

  • Review
By – February 23, 2026

A gen­er­a­tion ago, many left­ists were read­ing Wal­ter Ben­jamin. His thoughts on art in an age of mechan­i­cal repro­duc­tion” were both pro­to-Warhol and anti-bour­geois: instead of wor­ship­ping rare, sin­gu­lar works of art, why not cel­e­brate pho­tographs and posters and oth­er cheap­ly repro­duced and wide­ly con­sumed media? His stud­ies of Baude­laire start­ed him wan­der­ing the Paris arcades and cel­e­brat­ing all the accu­mu­lat­ed lay­ers of ephemera. Ben­jamin the flâneur inspired his read­ers to cel­e­brate the city as a smor­gas­bord of the senses.

We may have imag­ined Ben­jamin spend­ing his whole life sit­ting in cafes, roam­ing obscure back­streets and writ­ing anti-cap­i­tal­ist essays…but that was not the case, as Peter E. Gordon’s biog­ra­phy of Ben­jamin demon­strates. Born in 1892 to a mid­dle-class Ger­man Jew­ish fam­i­ly, Ben­jamin grew up intend­ing to be a pro­fes­sor of phi­los­o­phy at a tra­di­tion­al Ger­man uni­ver­si­ty. World War I inter­rupt­ed, but Ben­jamin was hard­ly mil­i­tary mate­r­i­al. At the same time, with Jew­ish quo­tas in the uni­ver­si­ties and the stub­born opaque­ness of Benjamin’s own writ­ings, he was com­ing to real­ize he would have a hard time find­ing any high-ranked pro­fes­sors to spon­sor his aca­d­e­m­ic career. Occa­sion­al fees from aca­d­e­m­ic jour­nals for obscure tracts on baroque tragedy weren’t pay­ing the rent, and his finan­cial dif­fi­cul­ties were only com­pound­ed when he mar­ried and had a child to sup­port. Soon, even his par­ents refused to cov­er his bills. 

His solu­tion was vague­ly prac­ti­cal and entire­ly roman­tic: to take pas­sage on ships to south­ern Euro­pean ports where at least the cost of liv­ing was low­er. He even tried a vis­it to the Sovi­et Union, only to real­ize he was unsuit­ed to the Marx­ist-Lenin­ist state. He flirt­ed with join­ing his dear friend, Ger­shom Scholem, in Jerusalem, but ulti­mate­ly, felt unable to com­mit. Indeed, the more friends like Adorno iden­ti­fied with Marx­ism, the more Ben­jamin real­ized his anarchic/​romantic ten­den­cies were incom­pat­i­ble with Marx­ist dialec­tics. He befriend­ed left­ist artists like Brecht, who weren’t as rigid ide­o­log­i­cal­ly, but by the 1930s, they were all look­ing around for an exit from Ger­many. Ben­jamin grav­i­tat­ed to his sec­ond home,” Paris, where he thought he could live cheap­ly and still write. Before long, Ben­jamin, in poor health and deep despair, was join­ing the thou­sands of oth­er state­less Jews look­ing for visas to any­where that would take them.

Gor­don actu­al­ly cov­ers Benjamin’s even­tu­al sui­cide in an intro­duc­to­ry chap­ter — his way of say­ing that Benjamin’s death did not define his life. As the read­er comes to the clos­ing pages of Benjamin’s sto­ry, his choice to leave this life seems inevitable. Decades ear­li­er, Ben­jamin had debat­ed the mean­ing and direc­tion of his­to­ry with oth­er phi­los­o­phy stu­dents. Now he knew: his­to­ry was just a train wreck” and progress was meaningless.

By set­ting aside the myths and try­ing to under­stand the actu­al man, Gor­don has made an impor­tant con­tri­bu­tion to Ben­jamin stud­ies. His analy­ses of Benjamin’s philo­soph­i­cal trea­tis­es may be a bit abstruse for the gen­er­al read­er, but they’re nec­es­sary for under­stand­ing why, ulti­mate­ly, Ben­jamin could nev­er make him­self into a Marx­ist dialec­ti­cian. For Ben­jamin, things were always too complicated.

Bet­ti­na Berch, author of the recent biog­ra­phy, From Hes­ter Street to Hol­ly­wood: The Life and Work of Anzia Yezier­s­ka, teach­es part-time at the Bor­ough of Man­hat­tan Com­mu­ni­ty College.

Discussion Questions